Pricing

What you get at the start: the Budget package with 1,000 credits covers up to 66 runs in Economy mode, around 28 runs in Standard, or about 20 runs in Premium. The Standard package with 2,000 credits gives you 130+ Economy runs or around 57 Standard runs. Premium with 4,000 credits covers up to 260+ Economy runs, around 114 Standard runs, or about 80 Premium runs.

What this means in practice: if you do everything manually, landing page analysis can take 30 to 60 minutes, a funnel can take 1 to 2 hours, one email takes another 20 to 40 minutes, and variations add even more time. With the modules, the same workflow becomes a launch-ready campaign in 5 to 15 minutes: Offer Intelligence takes seconds, Funnel Builder takes minutes, and generation, checking, and variation handling stay inside one system.

The economics in numbers: one run costs roughly between $0.2 and $1, while a single email from a copywriter often costs $5 to $20. That makes module-based production 10 to 50 times cheaper, especially when you need to test ideas fast and avoid waiting on external contractors.

How the workflow is built: you paste your offer URL, get the analysis, build the funnel, generate the emails, reduce deliverability risks, and prepare variations for scaling. If your credits run out, you can top them up at any time: 1,000 credits for 15 USDT, 2,500 for 30 USDT, 5,000 for 55 USDT, and 10,000 for 100 USDT. The larger the package, the lower the cost per run.

How this works together with AI Core. In AI Core you get the analysis, strategy, and email assets, then move the result into the EMA script and launch the campaign. AI Core handles strategy and content, while the EMA platform handles sending and scaling.

Why a ready-made solution is more effective. If you build everything from scratch, you need to search for modules, configure servers and MTA, test the setup, and fix errors. A ready-made package is already assembled and tested, so you can start immediately and spend less time on technical overhead.

Buying or renting. Buying is best if you plan to work long term and want full control over the system. Renting is convenient if you are testing a niche, launching first campaigns, or are not ready to deploy your own infrastructure yet.

Why EMA is often more effective than commercial services. An EMA script works like your own sending service inside your infrastructure: no hard limits, no sudden platform blocks, and no dependency on third-party rules. This gives you more control over sending, more flexibility in setup, and often better operational efficiency than classic SaaS email tools.

The key result. Without an EMA script you may have content but no real delivery layer. Without AI Core you may have sending but no generation system. Together they create a full email marketing cycle: from idea and analysis to launch, control, and scalable output.

Why you hit limits without an MTA. With standard SMTP setups, volume limits appear quickly, sending speed drops, delivery control stays weak, and the risk of blocks increases. That may be acceptable for small volume, but professional scaling requires a real transport layer.

Which MTA to choose. PowerMTA 5.0 r8 fits small and mid-sized volume when you need stable delivery without paying for unnecessary extras. PowerMTA 6.0 r3 is a better fit for long-term infrastructure and more flexible sending control. MailerQ is stronger for heavier loads, queues, and more advanced delivery logic.

How to choose quickly. Start and medium volume: PowerMTA 5. Growth and headroom for the future: PowerMTA 6. High loads and complex sending logic: MailerQ. That helps you choose the right MTA for your real workload instead of overpaying for the wrong level.

The main point. The EMA platform manages the campaign, but the MTA determines how many emails you can actually send, how fast they go out, and how reliably they arrive. If your goal is not just to send, but to scale without technical limits, the MTA becomes a core part of the entire system.